Buy Now or After Economic Crisis Hits
If I buy now, later crisis come, then I might lose my money. If I buy later, but crisis never come, then house prices could be even more expensive.
So, buy now or wait for crisis? Let’s try this mix and match method based on the tables and questions I have created on below. Just for fun, don’t take it too seriously.
Table 1: Capital Appreciation from 5% to 25% per annum
Year | +5% p.a. (RM) | +10% p.a. (RM) | +15% p.a. (RM) | +20% p.a. (RM) | +25% p.a. (RM) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 300,000 |
2011 | 315,000 | 330,000 | 345,000 | 360,000 | 375,000 |
2012 | 330,750 | 363,000 | 396,750 | 432,000 | 468,750 |
2013 | 347,288 | 399,300 | 436,425 | 518,000 | 585,938 |
2014 | 364,653 | 439,230 | 480,068 | 622,000 | 732,423 |
2015 | 382,886 | 483,153 | 552,079 | 746,400 | 915,529 |
Step 1: Estimate the capital appreciation in percentage for the shortlisted property that you are interested to invest. 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% per annum, …? Refer Table 1. It gives you an idea of how much is your property values worth over the years.
Step 2: Answer yourself, when will the economic crisis hits Malaysia? Anytime, end of this year, 2013, 2014, 2015, …? This is to understand how long is the time frame you have for your property increase its value.
Step 3: Answer yourself, how much will property price drop after economic crisis hits? 20%, 35%, 50%, …? This is important to forecast what’s the impact of economic crisis on our property values.
Step 4: Answer yourself, how long do you think the market will take to recover from the economic crisis? 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, …? You must understand how good is your holding power and be prepared for the worst scenario if you insist to invest in property now.
Table 2: Before Crisis (appreciate 5% p.a.) vs After Crisis (drop 20%, 35% or 50%)
Year | +5% (RM) | -20% (RM) | -35% (RM) | -50% (RM) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 300,000 | 240,000 | 195,000 | 150,000 |
2011 | 315,000 | 252,000 | 204,750 | 157,500 |
2012 | 330,750 | 264,600 | 214,988 | 165,375 |
2013 | 347,288 | 277,381 | 225,738 | 173,644 |
2014 | 364,653 | 291,723 | 237,025 | 182,327 |
2015 | 382,886 | 306,309 | 248,876 | 191,443 |
Table 3: Before Crisis (appreciate 10% p.a.) vs After Crisis (drop 20%, 35% or 50%)
Year | +10% (RM) | -20% (RM) | -35% (RM) | -50% (RM) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 300,000 | 240,000 | 195,000 | 150,000 |
2011 | 330,000 | 264,000 | 214,500 | 165,000 |
2012 | 363,000 | 290,400 | 235,950 | 181,500 |
2013 | 399,300 | 319,440 | 259,545 | 199,650 |
2014 | 439,230 | 351,384 | 285,500 | 219,615 |
2015 | 483,153 | 386,522 | 314,049 | 241,577 |
Example 1: Jane is considering to buy a house at RM363,000 this year and forecast it has potential to grow at 10% per annum, refer Table 3. Meantime, Jane believes that economic crisis will hits very soon in 2013 and forecast her property price might drop about 35% due to its not so good location. That means the property is worth only RM259,545 after depreciated 35% from RM399,300. Under this scenario, Jane should not go ahead for the deal, right?
Table 4: Before Crisis (appreciate 15% p.a.) vs After Crisis (drop 20%, 35% or 50%)
Year | +15% (RM) | -20% (RM) | -35% (RM) | -50% (RM) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 300,000 | 240,000 | 195,000 | 150,000 |
2011 | 345,000 | 276,000 | 224,250 | 172,500 |
2012 | 396,750 | 317,400 | 257,888 | 198,375 |
2013 | 436,425 | 349,140 | 283,676 | 218,213 |
2014 | 480,068 | 384,054 | 312,044 | 240,034 |
2015 | 552,079 | 441,663 | 358,851 | 276,040 |
Example 2: Peter is considering to buy a house at RM396,750 this year and forecast it has potential to grow at 15% per annum, refer Table 4. Meantime, Peter believes that economic crisis will hits in 2015 and forecast his property price will drop not more than 20% due to its good and demanding location. That means the property is still worth RM441,663 after depreciated 20% from RM552,079, which is still higher than initial purchase of RM396,750. If this is the case, Peter should go ahead and buy now, right?
Table 5: Before Crisis (appreciate 20% p.a.) vs After Crisis (drop 20%, 35% or 50%)
Year | +20% (RM) | -20% (RM) | -35% (RM) | -50% (RM) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 300,000 | 240,000 | 195,000 | 150,000 |
2011 | 360,000 | 288,000 | 234,000 | 180,000 |
2012 | 432,000 | 345,600 | 280,800 | 216,000 |
2013 | 518,000 | 414,400 | 336,700 | 259,000 |
2014 | 622,000 | 497,600 | 404,300 | 311,000 |
2015 | 746,400 | 597,120 | 485,160 | 373,200 |
Table 6: Before Crisis (appreciate 25% p.a.) vs After Crisis (drop 20%, 35% or 50%)
Year | +25% (RM) | -20% (RM) | -35% (RM) | -50% (RM) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 300,000 | 240,000 | 195,000 | 150,000 |
2011 | 375,000 | 300,000 | 243,750 | 187,500 |
2012 | 468,750 | 375,000 | 304,688 | 234,375 |
2013 | 585,938 | 468,750 | 380,860 | 292,969 |
2014 | 732,423 | 585,938 | 476,075 | 366,212 |
2015 | 915,529 | 732,423 | 595,094 | 457,765 |
“Crisis is Danger and Opportunity”
No comments:
Post a Comment